Correspondence Chess


I started to play Correspondence Chess in 2016. Link to my profile. First years I only played in unrated thematical events (fixed opening moves).

After much success and several tournament victorys the national fedration contacted my and got my into my first rated class tournament, a class H event (middle class) as well as introducing me to Team Matches. After that I got Elo I play in class M events(highest class) and got a CCE title and played for Team Sweden in team tournaments as well and also played for Team Europe vs Team Rest of the World .

Team Sweden

In order to get a Correspondence Chess Elo (rating) one must has played 12 rated games for provisional rating and 30 rated games for a fixed rating. I started to play in lots of Team Matches for Team Sweden to get enough games. Each match gives 2 games. I have won many of of my Team Matches for Team Sweden. I have also played for Team Europe in match vs Team The rest of the world. Bellow is list of my games for Team Sweden.

Friendly matches

  • vs Finland (Finland 100 years) in 2017 (completed in 2018, my score ended up in +2 =0 -0)
  • vs USA in 2018 (completed in 2018, my score ended up in +0 =2 -0)
  • vs Panama in 2018 (completed in 2018, my score ended up in +0 =2 -0. I took over the position in both games as stand-in)
  • vs England in 2018 (completed in 2018, my score ended up in +0 =2 -0)
  • vs Rest of the World 2018 (SSKK 80 years 2018) (completed in 2019, my score ended up in +1 =1 -0)
  • vs Scotland in 2019 (completed in 2020, my score ended up in +2 =0 -0)
  • vs Asia,Africa,Australia,New Zealand in 2019 (completed in 2019, my score ended up in +1 =1 -0)
  • vs Spain in 2019 (completed in 2020, my score ended up in +0 =2 -0)
  • vs Cuba in 2020 (completed in 2020, my score ended up in +0 =1 -1)
  • vs Romania in 2020 (completed in 2020, my score ended up in +0 =2 -0)
  • vs Europe in 2020 (completed in 2020, my score ended up in +1 =1 -0)
  • vs Portugal in 2020 (completed in 2020, my score ended up in +0 =2 -0)
  • vs Netherlands in 2021 (completed in 2021, my score ended up in +0 =2 -0)
  • vs England in 2021 (completed in 2021, my score ended up in +1 =1 -0)
  • vs South America in 2021 (competed in 2021, my score ended up in +0 =1 -1)
  • vs Baltic States in 2021 (ongoing, my current score is +0 =0 -0)

European Cup 2020

  • EU Team Cup Quarterfinal Sweden-Wales in 2020 (completed in 2020, my score ended up in +0 =2 -0)

Nol van't Riet Team Tournament

  • Team tournament, Semifinal (completed in 2021, my score ended up +2 =4 -1)

Promotition to hiegest class

I won my 2nd class H tournament and thus reached the hiegest class automaticly. However I already got a Elo rating high enough to played in hiegest class so I did not need the victory when the event was completed.

Diploma in hiegest class

After plaing in some events in hiegest class I got a diploma for a 3rd place.

How Elo system works

Elo rating in Correspondence Chess is much depending on start Elo. And start Elo is in turn much depending on ones opponents rating the first 30 games and the scores one got a fixed rating. Before one has Correspondence Chess Elo ones FIDE rating is used rounded down to nearest houndred. The Elo rating determents the events one can play or board in team matches and thus what opponents average Elo rating will be. With no Correspondence Chess Elo and 1800-1900 FIDE Elo the events one can play are limited.

Since its difficult to win in the modern Computer era it can take years or decades to get a high enough Elo rating to be able to play in events with possible norms for higher titles unless one has high FIDE Elo rating in the first place thus gets higher start Elo. In my personal experience, as of today there are not that much difference between 1900 Elo and 2200 Elo in Correspondence Chess except better openings while in over the board Chess has larger difference. 2300 and 2500 in Correspondence Chess are about the same in every single way, better openings and more patience than 1900-2200 but still that much better. The main diffence is what the events type, higher types of events has higher average Elo rating.

In the future I predict that it will take even longer to get higher Elo rating unless high FIDE Elo since Computers are getting stronger every year, thus one can never breach ones start Elo since draws cost Elo and wins are rare. Opening books are getting better with less ommited lines. In many of todays super elite tournaments one single win and no loses can lead to tournament victory. The same principle is also true at ameuter level in many Finals in some Thematical events (fixed opening moves).

I have played draws vs several players with 2500 Elo in rated games and players with 2600 Elo in Thematical events. I have also won over several titled players in both rated events and also in Thematical events.

Thus Elo system and Correspondence Chess titles works perfectly for two categorys of players. The first category are those who started played Correspondence Chess before Computers reached todays standard and the other category are those with high FIDE Elo. These players often players in closed events where one needs high rating to enter and thus theire Elo stays high and thus are not actually not better that the Elo indicates. Other players plays in class events where one rarely gains Elo since wins are rare or plays in open events where draws costs more and draws are the most common results since Computers makes less mistakes.

Titles in Correspondence Chess

The CCE title is the corresponding rank of the WIM title. The title WIM are not granted in Correspondence Chess anymore and has become gender neutral and anyone can get the title regardless of gender. Female players has the extra option to change CCE to LIM.

The next rank the title CCM and are the corresponding rank of the WGM title and the title WGM are not granted anymore in Correspondence Chess and has become gender neutral and anyone can get the title regardless of gender. Female players has the extra option to change CCM to LGM.

Next rank is IM and after that SIM and highest rank is GM.

Arbiters can also get special titles, but I am no shure how it works.

Players that does not have high FIDE elo or played before computers became good can normally only get CCE or in some cases CCM titles. This is how the systems works, I have taken points vs GM:s, SIM:s and IM:s in Thematical urated events and vs IM:s in rated event and thats an indicator the CCE players are not weaker than higher titled players.

Reaching destiny

I got my first title norm for the title CCE (Correspondence Chess Expert) in 2020. To get the title 2 norms are needed. One must also play a minimun amount of total norm games in the norms events as well. I got my 2nd norm, and thus the title, in 2021. To get a norm one has to score a minimun score in a closed norm event. Minimum score for norms is depending on type of event, even if the same norm type event. The lower type of events needs much higher score than than higher type of event. The type is depending on avarge ratings of all players. The type on can play is depending on Elo rating. In order to play one must have enough high Correspondence Chess Elo. I was lucky in some games where I was a bit worse and also took some tactical draws in both event to secure the norms.

Is also possible to get norms on other terms in other special events as well but most tournamnets has not got norm chanses unless one reaches final and only the final event has it. The score needed are depending on opponents average rating. A CCM I chatted with after I got my CCE title said thats easier to get norms, partcullary CCM norms, in open special open tournamnets since there are usually some weaker players when can win over and some higher rated one might draw than in dedicated norm events that I got my CCE norms in.

Key to succes in Computer era Correspondence Chess

My best tips for success in modern Correspondence Chess

Here bellow are a few of my main tips for anyone who wants to succed in modern Correspondence Chess

Also dont play to many games at once, in my personal experince one plays worse and plays to fast.

Developing a repertoire

The key to succes in Correspondence Chess is the opening fase. Without relevant imbalances its hard to win. Also make shure than one has an updated opening book.

I have bougt many opening bases from Modern Chess as backbone of a repertoire where I use some bases on over the board and some in Correspondence Chess play. However different authors are better than others. Some bases has great omnitions.

One can also not trust books or discs or databases blindly. Some lines given in books quating games by two 2600 Elo players can lose by force after Correspondence Chess improvments.

I have developed one repertoire for use in over the board play and one completely different repertoire for use in Correspondence Chess. Some openings that are great in over the baord can be completly wrong in Correspondence Chess and also the opposete.

Updated databases with high level games are essintial to get guidence and updated ideas in the opening. In one is luckly one can see what moves opponnet played in the past to get preparation.

Endgame tools

I have both surived and won some games by having bought 6 men tablebases on a USB drive. Tablebases also exist online with 7 men. Tablebases has every position with 7 or 6 or less figurer solved so one always plays optimal Chess. It is possible to claim wins or draws based on Tablebases. I use online to check 7 figurer when few pieces left while my computer can check 6 figures automatic even before having that number of pieices left in it within the horizon.


Its importent to have the latest version of ones favorite Chess analys engine. One must also know where engines can be trused or not. In many positions engines can be missleading. In recent years AI like "Alpha Zero" clones has improved engines strength but the AI engines often uses powerfull graphic cards to make calculations and not only CPU and RAM thus one neads a strong gaming laptop or computer. The better CPU and more RAM the faster the engines works. However in 2020 engines with other engines with "NNUE" technolgy appered the only uses CPU power.

I recommend to use a combination of "Fat Fritz 2.0" and the latest version of "Stockfish" or "Dragon by Komodo". An alternative are to use the combination of the latest version of "Stockfish" and either "Fat Fritz 2.0" or latest version of "Dragon by Komodo". Both "Fat Fritz 2.0" and latest "Stockfish" has neural networks like "Alpha Zero" but both are trained in completly different ways, has different styles and different evalution despite that "Fat Fritz 2.0" is using "Stockfish NNUE" as engine but has an uniquly trained neural network that is twice as large as "Stockfish" neural network so is gets a different evaluation and both engines are equally strong and complement each well and one if better than the other in different positions. "Dragon by Komodo". sorts uses both "NNUE" as well as a traditional engine depending since it uses evaulations that are stored in the network of they exist before. "Dragon by Komodo" are the engine or the future, its the only engines that actually improves. Hower "Stockfish" are still highest rated and "Fat Fritz 2.0" will eventually be out developed, since the aticles was originally writtens this has almost completly happens since "Dragon by Komodo 2.6" was realised and "Stockfish 14" sort of copyed "Fat Fritz 2.0" new concept but made it even better.

Remember that human intution moves can in many cases be better than engine moves. This is particullary true in the opening. Always analyse human intution moves as well.

How to win in Correspondence Chess

In the modern Computer age is very difficult to win regardless of rating difference. High rating does not mean strength it meen either high FIDE elo = higher start ELO or that the player played Correspondence Chess before Computers reached todays standard. Titles also meens little these days, I have even met IM:s with lower rating than me. At higher level a single win and no loses can lead to tournament victorys, this is also true in some Finals in Thematical events.

To win a game something from the list bellow must happend:

  • Either player messes up mover order in opening.
  • Either player blindly follows an opening book that are not good.
  • Either player plays an opening that is either dubious or better for opponent.
  • Either player makes some other kind of opening mistake.
  • Either players does not use computer check or use to low depth or uses and outdated engine or has not got tablebases.
  • Either players analys one move but manage to commit an other move or analysed the wrong position or was confused by similar ongoing games positions.
  • Either players loses on time.

Future plans

I will try to get a higher title called CCM (Correspondence Chess Master). I will also play more in open events and not only class events and norms events. I wil stop playing in thematical events and only play rated games.

I hope to win the hieghest class tournamnets someday in a not to distant future to compete in World Chess Championship qualification.

I also hope to win Swedish Correspondence Chess Championship someday but this will be only in a very distant future.