Correspondence Chess


I started to play Correspondence Chess in 2016. First years I only played in unrated thematical events (fixed opening moves).

After much success and several tournament victorys the national fedration contacted my and got my into my first rated class tournament, a class H event (middle class).

Team Sweden

In order to get a Correspondence Chess Elo (rating) one must has played 12 rated games for provisional rating and 30 rated games for a fixed rating. I started to play in lots of Team Matches for Team Sweden to get enough games. Each match gives 2 games. I have won many of of my Team Matches for Team Sweden. I have also played for Team Europe in match vs Team The rest fo the world. Bellow is list of my games for Team Sweden.

Friendly matches

  • vs Finland (Finland 100 years) in 2017 (completed in 2018, my score ended up in +2 =0 -0)
  • vs USA in 2018 (completed in 2018, my score ended up in +0 =2 -0)
  • vs Panama in 2018 (completed in 2018, my score ended up in +0 =2 -0. I took over the position in both games as stand-in)
  • vs England in 2018 (completed in 2018, my score ended up in +0 =2 -0)
  • vs Rest of the World 2018 (SSKK 80 years 2018) (completed in 2019, my score ended up in +1 =1 -0)
  • vs Scotland in 2019 (completed in 2020, my score ended up in +2 =0 -0)
  • vs Asia,Africa,Australia,New Zealand in 2019 (completed in 2019, my score ended up in +1 =1 -0)
  • vs Spain in 2019 (completed in 2020, my score ended up in +0 =2 -0)
  • vs Cuba in 2020 (competed in 2020, my score ended up in +0 =1 -1)
  • vs Romania in 2020 (completed in 2020, my score ended up in +0 =2 -0)
  • vs Europe in 2020 (completed in 2020, my score ended up in +1 =1 -0)
  • vs Portugal in 2020 (completed in 2021, my score ended up in +0 =2 -0)
  • vs Netherlands in 2021 (starts 2021-03-10)

Team tournaments

  • EU Team Cup Quarterfinal Sweden-Wales in 2020 (completed in 2020, my score ended up in +0 =2 -0)

Promotition to hiegest class

I won my 2nd class H tournament and thus reached the hiegest class automaticly. However I already got a Elo rating high enough to played in hiegest class so I did not need the victory when the event was completed.

Diploma in hiegest class

After plaing in some events in hiegest class I got a diploma for a 3rd place.

How Elo system works

Elo rating in Correspondence Chess is much depending on start Elo. And start Elo is in turn much depending on ones opponents rating the first 30 games and the scores one got a fixed rating. Before one has Correspondence Chess Elo ones FIDE rating is used rounded down to nearest houndred. The Elo rating determents the events one can play or board in team matches and thus what opponents average Elo rating will be.

Since its difficult to win in the modern Computer era it can take years or decades to get a high enough Elo rating to get titles unless one has high FIDE Elo rating in the first place thus gets higher start Elo. In my experience today there are not much difference between 1900 Elo and 2200 Elo in Correspondence Chess except better openings while in over the board Chess has larger difference. The main differnce is what the events type, higher types of events has higher average Elo rating.

In the future it will take even longer to get higher Elo rating since Computers are getting stronger every year and opening books are getting better with less ommited lines. In many of todays super elite tournaments one singel win and no loses can lead to tournament victory. The same principle is also true at ameuter level in many Finals in some Thematical events (fixed opening moves).

I have played draws vs several players with 2500 elo in rated games and players with 2600 elo in Thematical events. I have also won over several titled players.

Titles in Correspondence Chess

The CCE title is the corresponding rank of the WIM title. The title WIM are not granted in Correspondence Chess anymore and has become gender neutral and anyone can get the title regardless of gender. Female players has the extra option to change CCE to LIM.

The next rank the title CCM and are the corresponding rank of the WGM title and the title WGM are not granted anymore in Correspondence Chess and has become gender neutral and anyone can get the title regardless of gender. Female players has the extra option to change CCM to LGM.

Next rank is IM and after that SIM and highest rank is GM.

Arbiters can also get special titles, but I am no shure how it works.

Reaching destiny

I got my first title norm for the title CCE (Correspondence Chess Expert) in 2020. To get the title 2 norms are needed. One must also play a minimun amount of total norm games in the norms events as well. I got my 2nd norm, and thus the title, in 2021. To get a norm one has to score a minimun score in a closed norm event. Minimum score for norms is depending on type of event, even if the same norm type event. The lower type of events needs much higher score than than higher type of event. The type is depending on avarge ratings of all players. The type on can play is depending on Elo rating. In order to play one must have enough high Correspondence Chess Elo. I was lucky in some games where I was a bit worse and also took some tactical draws in both event to secure the norms.

Is also possible to get norms on other terms in other special events as well but most tournamnets has not got norm chanses unless one reaches final and only the final event has it. The score needed are depending on opponents average rating. A CCM I chatted with after I got my CCE title said thats easier to get norms, partcullary CCM norms, in open special open tournamnets since there are usually some weaker players when can win over and some higher rated one might draw than in dedicated norm events that I got mine in.

Key to succes in Computer era Correspondence Chess

My best tips for success in modern Correspondence Chess

Here bellow are a few of my main tips for anyone who wants to succed in modern Correspondence Chess

Also dont play to many games at once, in my personal experince one plays worse and plays to fast.

Developing a repertoire

The key to succes in Correspondence Chess is the opening fase. Without relevant imbalances its hard to win. Also make shure than one has an updated opening book.

I have bougt many opening bases from Modern Chess as backbone of a repertoire where I use some bases on over the board and some in Correspondence Chess play. However different authors are better than others. Some bases has great omnitions.

One can also not trust books or discs or databases blindly. Some lines given in books quating games by two 2600 Elo players can lose by force after Correspondence Chess improvments.

I have developed one repertoire for use in over the board play and one completely different repertoire for use in Correspondence Chess.

Endgame tools

I have both surived and won some games by having bought 6 men tablebases on a USB drive. Tablebases also exist online with 7 men. Tablebases has every position with 7 or 6 or less figurer solved so one always plays optimal Chess. It is possible to claim wins or draws based on Tablebases. I use online to check 7 figurer when few pieces left while my computer can check 6 figures automatic even before having that number of pieices left in it within the horizon.


Its importent to have the latest version of ones favorite Chess analys engine. One must also know where engines can be trused or not. In many positions engines can be missleading. In recent years AI like "Alpha Zero" clones has improved engines strength but the AI engines often uses powerfull graphic cards to make calculations and not only CPU and RAM thus one neads a strong gaming laptop or computer. The better CPU and more RAM the faster the engines works. However in 2020 engines with other engines with "NNUE" technolgy appered the only uses CPU power.

I recommend to use a combination of "Fat Fritz 2.0" and the latest version of "Stockfish". Both "Fat Fritz 2.0" and latest "Stockfish" has neural networks like "Alpha Zero" but both are trained in completly different ways, has different styles and different evalution despite that "Fat Fritz 2.0" is using "Stockfish NNUE" as engine but has an uniquly trained neural network that is twice as large as "Stochfish" neural network so is gets a different evaluation and both engines are equally strong and complement each well and one if better than the other in different positions.

Remember that human intution moves can in many cases be better than engine moves. This is particullary true in the opening. Always analyse human intution moves as well.

Future plans

I will try to get a higher title called CCM (Correspondence Chess Master). I will also play more in open events and not only class events and norms events. I wil stop playing in thematical events and only play rated games.

I hope to win the hieghest class tournamnets someday in a not to distant future to compete in World Chess Championship qualification.

I also hope to win Swedish Correspondence Chess Championship someday but this will be only in a very distant future.